Regulation

On Wednesday 27th August, the Canadian Digital Governance Standards Institute (DGSI) published CAN/DGSI 127:2025 – Age Assurance Technologies, Canada’s first national standard dedicated to the design and use of age assurance systems. This isn’t a new law mandating age checks – rather, it is a principles-based framework that sets out best practices for verifying users’ […]

3 min read
•
August 28, 2025
Share this article:

On Wednesday 27th August, the Canadian Digital Governance Standards Institute (DGSI) published CAN/DGSI 127:2025 – Age Assurance Technologies, Canada’s first national standard dedicated to the design and use of age assurance systems.

This isn’t a new law mandating age checks – rather, it is a principles-based framework that sets out best practices for verifying users’ ages in a privacy-preserving, proportionate, and risk-informed manner. However, with age verification currently on the legislative agenda in Canada, this standard will likely serve as a foundational reference point for any future regulatory requirements.

Why this standard matters

With access to age-inappropriate content and services online becoming increasingly widespread and easier for younger users to access in unregulated markets, organisations need trusted ways to determine user age while respecting privacy and accessibility.

DGSI’s new standard offers practical, privacy-preserving guidance to help platforms, policymakers, and solution providers create safer, age-appropriate online spaces.

What age assurance methods are covered?

The standard outlines seven categories of age assurance methods, each suited to different use cases and risk levels:

  1. Self-check – User declares their age.
  2. Document-based verification – Upload or scan official ID.
  3. Biometric and characteristic-based verification – Use of biological or feature analysis.
  4. Capacity testing – Cognitive tasks to infer age.
  5. Cross-account or cross-platform authentication – Age verified via another account or service.
  6. Profiling – Analyse user behaviour or attributes (like email address).
  7. Authorised confirmation – An adult (e.g. parent or professional) confirms age.

The standard notes that some attempts to restrict access through methods such as self-check or declaration have historically been unreliable, as they are easily bypassed. They also note that some of the above measures should be integrated with other processes/measures to protect minors and control access to services, and each measure carries a varying level of risk for the individual. 

The role of innovative age check solutions, including email-based age estimation

One notable aspect of the new standard is its recognition of a wide range of age assurance technologies, including innovative, low-friction age check methods such as email-based age estimation.

Within the framework of CAN/DGSI 127, email-based age estimation is likely best understood under method 6: Profiling. This category refers to the process of analysing the behaviour of users to predict their ages. Data used for profiling consists of information that users choose to share about themselves and information that is automatically collected from their engagement with services. 

While the standard does not prescribe specific risk thresholds or deployment conditions for profiling, it places this method alongside others in a broader risk-based framework – where the sensitivity of content or service should inform the level of assurance required.

Email-based age estimation is gaining significant traction among both platforms and users 

Recent Ipsos research in the UK found that 56% of users would be willing to use their email address to prove their age – a trend that mirrors what we’ve seen across our client base for years.

This method is particularly popular for its privacy-preserving, inclusive and low-friction nature – allowing platforms to determine a user’s age to a high degree of accuracy, without requiring ID uploads, selfies, credit card details or apps to download.

What comes next?

While CAN/DGSI 127 is not legislation, it establishes a clear national benchmark for age assurance practices in Canada. 

If your platform offers age-restricted content or services for Canadian users, now is the time to review your existing age verification approach. In many cases, leveraging email data already collected at account sign-up can offer a simple, privacy-conscious path to compliance.

Get in touch – we’d be happy to help assess your current setup and explore how email-based age estimation can fit into your compliance strategy.

You can access more information at http://www.dgc-cgn.org or the Standards Council of Canada.

About the author

Verifymy

Verifymy is a safety technology provider on a mission to safeguard children and society online.

Subscribe and keep up to date

Related articles

Online Safety

Today, Ofcom published its Use of Age Assurance Report 2026 – its first statutory assessment of how regulated services have used age assurance under the Online Safety Act, and how effective it has actually been. The report draws on research, Information Notices and Ofcom’s Call for Evidence, and focuses on the first six months since […]

3 min read
•
July 16, 2026
Regulation

The UK government has announced plans to introduce a nationwide ban on social media access for children under the age of 16, marking one of the most significant proposed interventions in online child safety to date. Under the proposals, children under 16 would be prohibited from accessing major social media platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Threads, […]

5 min read
•
June 15, 2026
Online Safety

The G7 nations have agreed a landmark set of common principles aimed at creating a safer and more secure online environment for children and young people. While governments around the world have increasingly focused on online safety in recent years, the agreement marks one of the clearest examples yet of international alignment around a shared […]

4 min read
•
June 3, 2026